Climate The Movie – scientists speak up

W.H.O. Concedes The Covid Virus Is Just Like The Common Flu - 500,000 Americans Dead From Vaccine

• The corona crisis must be renamed the “Corona Scandal”
• It is:
• The biggest tort case ever
• The greatest crime against humanity ever committed
• Those responsible must be:
• Criminally prosecuted for crimes against humanity
• Sued for civil damages
• Deaths
• There is no excess mortality in any country
• Corona virus mortality equals seasonal flu
• 94% of deaths in Bergamo were caused by transferring sick patients to nursing homes where they infected old people with weak immune systems
• Doctors and hospitals worldwide were paid to declare deceased victims of Covid-19
• Autopsies showed:
• Fatalities almost all caused by serious pre-existing conditions
• Almost all deaths were very old people
• Sweden (no lockdown) and Britain (strict lockdown) have comparable disease and mortality statistics
• US states with and without lockdowns have comparable disease and mortality statistics
• Health
• Hospitals remain empty and some face bankruptcy
• Populations have T-cell immunity from previous influenza waves
• Herd immunity needs only 15-25% population infection and is already achieved
• Only when a person has symptoms can an infection be contagious
• Tests:
• Many scientists call this a PCR-test pandemic, not a corona pandemic
• Very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive
• Likelihood of false-positives is 89-94% or near certainty
• Prof. Drosten developed his PCR test from an old SARS virus without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China
• The PCR test is not based on scientific facts with respect to infections
• PCR tests are useless for the detection of infections
• A positive PCR test does not mean an infection is present or that an intact virus has been found
• Amplification of samples over 35 cycles is unreliable but WHO recommended 45 cycles
• Illegality:
• The German government locked down, imposed social-distancing/ mask-wearing on the basis of a single opinion
• The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating
• The lockdowns were based on non-existent infections
• Former president of the German federal constitutional court doubted the constitutionality of the corona measures
• Former UK supreme court judge Lord Sumption concluded there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for corona measures
• German RKI (CDC equivalent) recommended no autopsies be performed
• Corona measures have no sufficient factual or legal basis, are unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately
• No serious scientist gives any validity to the infamous Neil Ferguson’s false computer models warning of millions of deaths
• Mainstream media completely failed to report the true facts of the so-called pandemic
• Democracy is in danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models
• Drosten (of PCR test), Tedros of WHO, and others have committed crimes against humanity as defined in the International Criminal Code
• Politicians can avoid going down with the charlatans and criminals by starting the long overdue public scientific discussion
• Conspiracy:
• Politicians and mainstream media deliberately drove populations to panic
• Children were calculatedly made to feel responsible “for the painful tortured death of their parents and grandparents if they do not follow Corona rules”
• The hopeless PCR test is used to create fear and not to diagnose
• There can be no talk of a second wave
• Injury and damage:
• Evidence of gigantic health and economic damage to populations
• Anti-corona measures have:
• Killed innumerable people
• Destroyed countless companies and individuals worldwide
• Children are being taken away from their parents
• Children are traumatized en masse
• Bankruptcies are expected in small- and medium-sized businesses
• Redress:
• A class action lawsuit must be filed in the USA or Canada, with all affected parties worldwide having the opportunity to join
• Companies and self-employed people must be compensated for damages

1. Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a PCR-test pandemic? Specifically, does a positive PCR-test result mean that the person tested is infected with Covid-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with the Covid-19 infection?
2. Do the so-called anti-corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face masks, social distancing, and quarantine regulations, serve to protect the world’s population from corona, or do these measures serve only to make people panic so that they believe – without asking any questions – that their lives are in danger, so that in the end the pharmaceutical and tech industries can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic fingerprints?
3. Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied, more so than any other country, by the chief protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic, Mr. Drosten, virologist at charity hospital in Berlin; Mr. Wieler, veterinarian and head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI; and Mr. Tedros, Head of the World Health Organization or WHO; because Germany is known as a particularly disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for the rest of the world for its strict and, of course, successful adherence to the corona measures?

1. How dangerous is the virus really?
2. What is the significance of a positive PCR test?
3. What collateral damage has been caused by the corona measures, both with respect to the world population’s health, and with respect to the world’s economy?

1. As a result of a damage-inducing event …
2. A large number of people suffer the same type of damage.

Nescience vs Ignorance

Nescience
From the Latin verb nesciere:
“to not know because knowledge was absent or unattainable”.

Ignorance
From the Latin verb ignorare:
“to not know even though necessary information is present, because that information has been willfully refused or disregarded”.

The video quality is poor but it explains the whole COVID situation, its background, its ramifications, including the negative consequences the COVID 'vaccines' and other vaccines have. These new gene modifying ‘vaccines’ are actually operative systems that will change humanity according to what the programmers want. This will unfortunately unfold in the future…

This video is long but you will understand what was planned and what’s going on these days and why.

I copied the video file to my website because it was difficult to watch it uninterrupted on the source site (playback stopped several times, sometimes didn't play at all). Hope it'll work better from here.



Source:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dlJdGetRasc0/

BEDRÄGERI.

Här är videon jag länkade in ovan (ifall länken skulle sluta funka):



And finally a letter from a doctor who explains how the covid vaccine works:

Dear Patients and Friends, Last week I must have been asked 20 times about the new COVID vaccines. Here are my thoughts. Please pass this information onto many as you can. People need to have fully informed consent when it comes to injecting foreign genetic material into their bodies.
The COVID vaccines are mRNA vaccines. mRNA vaccines are a completely new type of vaccine. No mRNA vaccine has ever been licensed for human use before. In essence, we have absolutely no idea what to expect from this vaccine. We have no idea if it will be effective or safe. Traditional vaccine simply introduce pieces of a virus to stimulate an immune reaction. The new mRNA vaccine is completely different. It actually injects (transfects) molecules of synthetic genetic material from non-humans sources into our cells. Once in the cells, the genetic material interacts with our transfer RNA (tRNA) to make a foreign protein that supposedly teaches the body to destroy the virus being coded for. Note that these newly created proteins are not regulated by our own DNA, and are thus completely foreign to our cells. What they are fully capable of doing is unknown. The mRNA molecule is vulnerable to destruction. So, in order to protect the fragile mRNA strands while they are being inserted into our DNA they are coated with PEGylated lipid nanoparticles. This coating hides the mRNA from our immune system which ordinarily would kill any foreign material injected into the body. PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been used in several different drugs for years. Because of their effect on immune system balance, several studies have shown them to induce allergies and autoimmune diseases. Additionally, PEGylated lipid nanoparticles have been shown to trigger their own immune reactions, and to cause damage to the liver. These new vaccines are additionally contaminated with aluminum, mercury, and possibly formaldehyde. The manufacturers have not yet disclosed what other toxins they contain. Since viruses mutate frequently, the chance of any vaccine working for more than a year is unlikely. That is why the flu vaccine changes every year. Last year’s vaccine is no more valuable than last year’s newspaper. Absolutely no long term safety studies will have been done to ensure that any of these vaccines don’t cause the cancer, seizures, heart disease, allergies, and autoimmune diseases seen with other vaccines. If you ever wanted to be guinea pig for Big Pharma, now is your golden opportunity. Many experts question whether the mRNA technology is ready for prime time. In November 2020, Dr. Peter Jay Hotez said of the new mRNA vaccines, "I worry about innovation at the expense of practicality because they [the mRNA vaccines] are weighted toward technology platforms that have never made it to licensure before.” Dr. Hotez is Professor of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology at Baylor College of Medicine, where he is also Director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development. Michal Linial, PhD is a Professor of Biochemistry. Because of her research and forecasts on COVID-19, Dr. Linial has been widely quoted in the media. She recently stated, "I won't be taking it [the mRNA vaccine] immediately – probably not for at least the coming year. We have to wait and see whether it really works. We will have a safety profile for only a certain number of months, so if there is a long-term effect after two years, we cannot know." In November 2020, The Washington Post reported on hesitancy among healthcare professionals in the United States to the mRNA vaccines, citing surveys which reported that: "some did not want to be in the first round, so they could wait and see if there are potential side effects", and that "doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic". Since the death rate from COVID resumed to the normal flu death rate way back in early September, the pandemic has been over since then. Therefore, at this point in time no vaccine is needed. The current scare tactics regarding “escalating cases” is based on a PCR test that because it exceeds 34 amplifications has a 100% false positive rate unless it is performed between the 3rd and 5th day after the first day of symptoms. It is therefor 100% inaccurate in people with no symptoms. This is well established in the scientific literature. See the attachment (False Positive PCR testing is up to 100%!) for more information on this. If you go to the CDC site (file:///C:/Users/docto/AppData/Local/Temp/cdc_97230_DS1.pdf ), you can see that the weekly death rates in the US are now lower than they normally are during an average flu season. The other reason you don’t need a vaccine for COVID-19 is that substantial herd immunity has already taken place in the United States. This is the primary reason for the end of the pandemic. Unfortunately, you cannot completely trust what you hear from the media. They have consistently got it wrong for the past year. Since they are all supported by Big Pharma and the other entities selling the COVID vaccines, they are not going to be fully forthcoming when it comes to mRNA vaccines. Every statement I have made here is fully backed by published scientific references. I would be very interested to see verification that Bill and Melinda Gates with their entire family including grandchildren, Joe Biden and President Trump and their entire families, and Anthony Fauci and his entire family all get the vaccine. Anyone who after reading all this still wants to get injected with the mRNA vaccine, should at the very least have their blood checked for COVID-19 antibodies. There is no need for a vaccine in persons already naturally immunized. Here's my bottom line: I would much rather get a COVID infection than get a COVID vaccine. That would be safer and more effective. I have had a number of COVID positive flu cases this year. Some were old and had health concerns. Every single one has done really well with natural therapies including ozone therapy and IV vitamin C. Just because modern medicine has no effective treatment for viral infections, doesn’t mean that there isn’t one. Yours Always, Frank Shallenberger, MD, HMD
References Garade, Damien (10 November 2020). "The story of mRNA: How a once-dismissed idea became a leading technology in the Covid vaccine race". Stat. Retrieved 16 November 2020. Cooney, Elizabeth (1 December 2020). "How nanotechnology helps mRNA Covid-19 vaccines work". Stat. Retrieved 3 December 2020. Verbeke, Rein; Lentacker, Ine; De Smedt, Stefaan C.; Dewitte, Heleen (October 2019). "Three decades of messenger RNA vaccine development".NanoToday.28:100766.doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2019.100766. Roberts, Joanna (1 June 2020). "Five things you need to know about: mRNA vaccines". Horizon. Retrieved 16 November 2020. PHG Foundation (2019). "RNA vaccines: an introduction". University of Cambridge. Retrieved 18 November 2020. Pardi, Norbert; Hogan, Michael J.; Porter, Frederick W.; Weissman, Drew (April 2018). "mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology". Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. 17 (4): 261–279. doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.243. PMC 5906799. PMID 29326426. Kramps, Thomas; Elders, Knut (2017). "Introduction to RNA Vaccines". RNA Vaccines: Methods and Protocols. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6481-9_1. ISBN 978-1-4939-6479-6. Retrieved 18 November 2020. Dogan, Ellie (25 November 2020). "COVID-19 vaccines poised for launch, but impact on pandemic unclear". Nature. doi:10.1038/d41587-020-00022-y. Retrieved 30 November 2020. "Seven vital questions about the RNA Covid-19 vaccines emerging from clinical trials". Wellcome Trust. 19 November 2020. Retrieved 26 November 2020. Jaffe-Hoffman, Maayan (17 November 2020). "Could mRNA COVID-19 vaccines be dangerous in the long-term?". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 17 November 2020. Eugene Gu (21 May 2020). "This is the hard-to-swallow truth about a future coronavirus vaccine (and yes, I'm a doctor)". The Independent. Retrieved 23 November 2020. Rowland, Christopher (21 November 2020). "Doctors and nurses want more data before championing vaccines to end the pandemic". Washington Post. Retrieved 22 November 2020. Thomas, Katie (22 October 2020). "Experts Tell F.D.A. It Should Gather More Safety Data on Covid-19 Vaccines". New York Times. Retrieved 21 November 2020. Kuchler, Hannah (30 September 2020). "Pfizer boss warns on risk of fast-tracking vaccines". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 November 2020. Guarascio, Francesco (2 December 2020). "EU criticizes 'hasty' UK approval of COVID-19 vaccine". Reuters. Retrieved 2 December 2020. Berglund, Peter; Smerdou, Cristian; Fleeton, Marina N.; Tubulekas, Loannis; Liljeström, Peter (June 1998). "Enhancing immune responses using suicidal DNA vaccines". Nature Biotechnology. 16 (6): 562–565. doi:10.1038/nbt0698-562. ISSN 1546-1696. Garde, Damien (10 January 2017). "Lavishly funded Moderna hits safety problems in bold bid to revolutionize medicine". Stat. Archived from the original on 16 November 2020. Retrieved 19 May 2020. Jaffe-Hoffman, Maayan (1 December 2020). "Hadassah research head raises questions about mRNA vaccine safety". The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved 1 December 2020. Doshi, Peter (26 November 2020). "Pfizer and Moderna's "95% effective" vaccines—let's be cautious and first see the full data". British Medical Journal. Retrieved 3 December 2020. Robert; Blankschtein, Daniel (May 2016). "mRNA vaccine delivery using lipid nanoparticles". Therapeutic Delivery. 7 (5): 319–334. doi:10.4155/tde-2016-0006. ISSN 2041-5990. PMC 5439223. PMID 27075952. Wadman, Meridith (27 November 2020). "Public needs to prep for vaccine side effects". Science. 370 (6520): 1022. doi:10.1126/science.370.6520.1022. Retrieved 27 November 2020.

Chinese CDC Admits On NBC That They Never Isolated The Virus, And That China Is Fabricating The Narrative

Leading Corona Researchers Admit That They Have No Scientific Proof For The Existence Of A Virus

• Unscientific methods that became worldwide consensus
• Neither Koch's nor Rivers' postulates were fulfilled; the rest were assumptions and guesswork
• …and other important info

• World Bank had plans about COVID-19 already 2017. So that’s why the covid pandemic declared this year is a PLANdemic.
• CDC itself noted that only 6 % of the total deaths counted were caused by COVID-19. So the other 94 % did not die because of COVID-19, only they were counted as such on your tv and on worldometers to keep the plandemic alive.